Understanding Complexity

Acerola Strategies · Complexity Diagnostic

Problem Complexity Classifier

Beyond Complexity, To Your Next Frontier

Before deciding what to do about a challenge, it helps to know what kind of challenge it is. Answer twelve statements about one specific problem and this tool will place it on the Alford–Head typology and name the kind of intervention that fits.

Where this fits. This is one instrument from the Complexity Diagnostic — the assessment Acerola Strategies runs at the start of an engagement, and the part we can put directly in your hands.

In a full diagnostic it works with three others: the same statements answered across your whole stakeholder group, a readiness and team-climate measure, and recorded interviews that surface what people know but rarely say out loud. Together they map every challenge on your table at once — and the sharpest finding is almost always the distance between how differently people see it.

So read the result below as your view, clearly measured. The full picture — and the conversation worth having — comes from seeing everyone else's.
Step 1

Name the challenge


Write it as people in the organization actually say it. Every statement below refers to this one challenge.

Step 2

Twelve statements


1 = Strongly disagree  ·  5 = Strongly agree. There are no right answers.

The nature of the problem

People and organizational context

Your result

 

Problem clarity / 5 Stakeholder alignment / 5 Wickedness Index / 100
Where it sits

The Alford–Head typology


Two dimensions, three bands each, nine classes. Difficulty increases downward and to the right.

Problem &
solution clear
Problem clear,
solution unclear
Neither
clear
Cooperative
Knowledge
fragmented
Interests
in conflict

Adapted from Alford, J., & Head, B. W. (2017). Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework. Policy and Society, 36(3), 397–413.

What each class means

Nine classes, nine responses


Expand any class for examples and the methods that suit it.

Where this leads

Two answers, and we will tell you which one applies


Classification is the first move, not the whole method. What comes after it — mapping the assets and people the problem already has, designing the intervention, and setting the cadence that keeps it moving — is chosen by the class you land in. That is why we start here.

Technical → expertise is enough

If your challenge is tame or analytically complex, the honest answer is a subject-matter expert. We have specialists on our bench and will source one when the problem calls for expertise we don't hold — and if you don't need us at all, that is what we will say.

Wicked → expertise alone won't close it

No one holds the whole answer, so no expert can hand it to you. What closes it is practiced capability across multiple teams, running small experiments on a fixed learning cadence — the discipline of Strategic Doing®, which we are credentialed to teach.